WORK SAFETY AND CRIMINAL TRIAL LAW
DIRITTO PROCESSUALE PENALE DELLA SICUREZZA SUL LAVORO
A.Y. | Credits |
---|---|
2017/2018 | 6 |
Lecturer | Office hours for students | |
---|---|---|
Chiara Gabrielli | Thursday at the end of the lessons |
Assigned to the Degree Course
Date | Time | Classroom / Location |
---|
Date | Time | Classroom / Location |
---|
Learning Objectives
The course will tend firstly to illustrate the thypes and the basic principles of the criminale trial, in order to re-establish a systematic contesxt, made hars by the many reforms of recent years. Later the main institutes and rules related to criminal trial law concerning work safety will be examinated, through the analysis of the case law in this matter and the solution of pratical cases.
Program
The course will develop the following matters, under the specific point of view of the criminal trial concerning work safety
the criminal procedural system - Consistutional principles of the criminal law - Jurisdiction and prosecution - The subjects of the trial - Procedural acts and penalities - The general principles on evidence - the evidence - Preliminary investigations - Preliminary hearing - Special proceeding - The judgement of first istance
Bridging Courses
Criminal labor law
Learning Achievements (Dublin Descriptors)
A) Knowledge and understanding - The student must show to have a suitable knowledge of the sources of the Italian criminal trial and the ability of understanding of its constitutional and international principles and he also must show his understanding of its translation offered by the criminal procedure laws.
B) Applying knowledge and understanding - The student must show to be able to apply his knowledge by formulating possible interpretative solutions on controversial issues relating to criminal procedural law.
C) Making judgements - The student must show to be able to integrate knowledge of criminal procedure law institutes with those of the constitutional and European right, as well with those of similar disciplines (es. judicial system, penitentiary right, civil and administrative trial right) and to make critical judgments on the basis of this interdisciplinary platform.
D) Communication skills - The student must show to be an active part in seminars, groupworks and in any planned activities in the living law laboratories , he must also show to be able to explain clearly and effectively the reached conclusions on the argumentative plan, dealing with teachers and with colleagues.
E) Learning skills - The student must show to have developed the learning skills to continue the study of the criminal procedure on his own and that he has the means to understand the main criticalities of the system end possible reforms to amend them.
Teaching Material
The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it
Supporting Activities
Seminars, conferences and meetings on the subject themes of legislative reforms and jurisprudential contrasts.
The teaching material and specific communications from the lecturer can be found, together with other supporting activities, inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it
Teaching, Attendance, Course Books and Assessment
- Teaching
Lectures - Seminars - The living law Laboratories
- Attendance
None
- Course books
G. Conso-V. Grevi-M. Bargis, Compendio di procedura penale, VIII ed., 2016, limited to: chapter I (paragraphes from 1 to 38), chapter II (paragraphes fra 8 to 10; from 28 to 34), chapter III, chapter V, chapter VI (paragraphes from 1 to 18 and from 28 to 32); chapter VII.
S. Dovere, I procedimenti definitori nella tutela penale della salute e della sicurezza sul lavoro, in AA. VV., Trattato di procedura penale, a cura di G. Spangher – vol. VII, Modelli differenziati di accertamento, tomo II, Utet, 2011, p. 761 ss.
- Assessment
The expected learning results will be evaluated by means of an oral exam, based on three questions or more. The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:
less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
18-20: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
21-23: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.
24-26: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.
27-29: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.
30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.
- Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)
Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.
To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.
Additional Information for Non-Attending Students
- Attendance
None
- Course books
G. Conso-V. Grevi-M. Bargis, Compendio di procedura penale, VIII ed., 2016, limited to: chapter I (paragraphes fra 1 to 38), chapter II (paragraphes from 8 to 10; from 28 to 34), chapter III, chapter V, chapter VI (paragraphes from 1 to 18 and from 28 to 32); chapter VII.
S. Dovere, I procedimenti definitori nella tutela penale della salute e della sicurezza sul lavoro, in AA. VV., Trattato di procedura penale, a cura di G. Spangher – vol. VII, Modelli differenziati di accertamento, tomo II, Utet, 2011, p. 761 ss.
- Assessment
The expected learning results will be evaluated by means of an oral exam, based on three questions. The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:
less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
18-20: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
21-23: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.
24-26: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.
27-29: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.
30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.
- Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)
Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.
To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.
« back | Last update: 26/09/2017 |