CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND BUSINESS LAW
PROCEDURA PENALE DELLA IMPRESA
A.Y. | Credits |
---|---|
2018/2019 | 6 |
Lecturer | Office hours for students | |
---|---|---|
Chiara Gabrielli |
Assigned to the Degree Course
Date | Time | Classroom / Location |
---|
Date | Time | Classroom / Location |
---|
Learning Objectives
The course means to give to students the knowledge of the trial rules and regulations to investigate criminal liability of the collective institutions especially of the companies.
Program
general characteristics of the companies and other institutions criminal liability.enforceability of the rules of the criminal procedure's code "as compatible". Enforceability to the collective institution of the guarantees expected for the defendant. Rules and regulations of pre-trial enquiries: terms of duration, warning that one is under investigation, dismissal. Loss of criminal prosecution.The system of the summons to the companies. The company' s legal representation. the incompatibilities with the witnesship. The pre-trial measures (coercive and control measures). the preliminary hearing , the trial, the alternative proceedings. General lines of the impugnments and of the enforcement.
Bridging Courses
Criminal law 1
Learning Achievements (Dublin Descriptors)
A) Knowledge and understanding - The student must show to have a suitable knowledge of the procedeedings to establish the criminal liability of the collective institutions especially of the companies and he must show the ability of understanding of its constitutional and international principles and he also must show his understanding of its translation offered by the criminal procedure laws.
B) Applying knowledge and understanding - The student must show to be able to apply his knowledge by formulating possible interpretative solutions on controversial issues.
C) Making judgements - The student must show to be able to integrate the knowledge of the institutes of the company's criminal procedure with those of the criminal procedure law and as well with those of similar disciplines (es. civil and administrative trial right) and to make critical judgments on the basis of this interdisciplinary platform.
D) Communication skills - The student must show to be an active part in seminars, groupworks and in any planned activities in the living law laboratories , he must also show to be able to explain clearly and effectively the reached conclusions on the argumentative plan, dealing with teachers and with colleagues.
E) Learning skills - The student must show to have developed the learning skills to continue the study of the company's criminal procedure on his own and that he has the means to understand the main criticalities of the system end possible reforms to amend them.
Teaching Material
The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it
Supporting Activities
Specifications and slides.
Seminars, conferences and meetings on the subject themes of legislative reforms and jurisprudential contrasts.
Teaching, Attendance, Course Books and Assessment
- Teaching
Lectures - Seminars - The living law Laboratories
- Attendance
None
- Course books
Massimo Ceresa Gastaldo, Procedura penale delle società, Giappichelli, 2015
- Assessment
The oral exam, considered the only one suitable to test communication and technical skills of the student, as well as attitudes to establish connections with the of similar disciplines of the criminal procedural law.
The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:
less than 18/30: insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
18-20/30: sufficient. The student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
21-24/30: satisfactory. The student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.
25-27/30: good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.
28-30/30: very good. The student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.
30 with honours: excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.
Intermediate written test with open questions.
- Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)
Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.
To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.
Additional Information for Non-Attending Students
- Teaching
The professor will provide teaching materials to the students in the Moodle platform in e-learning.
- Attendance
None
- Course books
Massimo Ceresa Gastaldo, Procedura penale delle società, Giappichelli, 2015
- Assessment
The oral exam, considered the only one suitable to test communication and technical skills of the student, as well as attitudes to establish connections with the of similar disciplines disciplines of constitutional law and the criminal procedural law.
The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:
less than 18/30: insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
18-20/30: sufficient. The student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
21-24/30: satisfactory. The student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.
25-27/30: good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.
28-30/30: very good. The student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.
30 with honours: excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.
- Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)
Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.
To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.
« back | Last update: 12/07/2018 |