ADVANCED PRIVATE LAW
DIRITTO PRIVATO PROGREDITO
A.Y. | Credits |
---|---|
2017/2018 | 9 |
Lecturer | Office hours for students | |
---|---|---|
Paolo Morozzo della Rocca |
Assigned to the Degree Course
Date | Time | Classroom / Location |
---|
Date | Time | Classroom / Location |
---|
Learning Objectives
The course provides students who are already holders of basic institutional notions of private law. The didactic goal is to consolidate these notions about the discipline of the person's ability, of the properties and their circulation. The methodological objective is to improve the student's approach to the legal text introducing short non-institutional readings in order to encourage a greater critical sense in the understanding of the legal system. Therefore expects the attainment of a first, elementary, methodological capacity.
Program
Sources of private law; law enforcement; legal activities and subjective legal situations; theory of legal facts; Advertising and proof of legal facts; the act in space and time; the subjects of law; the personality rights; the goods; the property and rights in rem; the possessory situations and the effects of the possession; the company and intangible assets. They find their place in the second semester also thematic studies relating to the discipline of real rights.
Bridging Courses
Diritto privato
Learning Achievements (Dublin Descriptors)
A) knowledge and understanding: The students will demonstrate knowledge acquired through study of institutional texts (knowledge of the sources of law and of the most notable case law). They must also demonstrate the ability to understand short monographs, acquiring the ability to develop and produce original ideas, with the study of judgment or cases proposed by the teacher.
B) applying knowledge and understanding: The student will demonstrate to be able to apply their knowledge, understanding and skills in solving problems related to the matter even within broader contexts or interdisciplinary. Must in particular acquire at least initial capacity of subsumption of the case in the regulatory scheme by solving emblematic cases.
C) Making judgments: The student will demonstrate the ability to integrate knowledge and handle complexity, and formulate judgments based also upon incomplete or limited information, but that include reflecting on social and ethical consequences related to interpretative options adopted.
D) Communication skills: The student must demonstrate the ability to communicate clearly and unambiguously its conclusions on the occasion of group work, seminars, workshops, speaking correctly with the teacher and their colleagues in the context of the working class.
E) learning skills: Students must demonstrate that they have developed those learning skills that will enable them to continue studying in a largely self-directed or self even on monographic texts and cases.
Teaching Material
The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it
Supporting Activities
exercises also for the students that usually do not attend to lessons.
For individual reading: documents ont the Moodle platform.
Teaching, Attendance, Course Books and Assessment
- Teaching
Lectures and exercises with cases
- Course books
- A Manual of private law, only the parts in the program
- Caterina R., Le persone fisiche, Giappichelli, Turin, 2016
- papers charged on Moodle Platform until 15 mars 2018
- Assessment
oral examinations by interview in order to assess the student's ability to communicate and verify the student's ability to interact in defense of arguments and theses, especially with regard to topics in-depth lectures and exercises .
The expected learning results will be evaluated by means of an oral exam, based on three questions or more. The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:
less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
18-20: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
21-23: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.
24-26: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.
27-29: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.
30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.
- Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)
Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.
To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.
Additional Information for Non-Attending Students
- Teaching
Sharing through the Moodle platform of court materials and any other documents
- Course books
- A Manual of private law, only the parts in the program (recommended: F. Gazzoni, ESI, Naples, 2015, from p.1 to p.312 and from p.1355 to p. 1383)
- Marmocchi E. (eds) Le servitù prediali fra tradizione e attualità, Giuffré, Milano, 2011
- Caterina R., Individuals, Giappichelli, Torino, 2012
- Assessment
oral examinations by interview in order to assess the student's ability to communicate and verify the student's ability to interact in defense of arguments and theses, especially with regard to topics in-depth lectures and exercises.
The expected learning results will be evaluated by means of an oral exam, based on three questions or more. The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:
less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
18-20: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
21-23: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.
24-26: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.
27-29: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.
30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.
- Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)
Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.
To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.
« back | Last update: 22/09/2017 |