Allow the student to acquire sufficient knowledge, including critical and problematic, between domestic law, European Union law and international treaties with regard to food law.

Food products between domestic law, European Union law and international multilateral treaties; principles of food law; the market for agricultural and food products; quality systems; production and marketing of food products; the controls.

Knowledge and understanding (knowledge and understanding)

The student who has passed the food safety law exam has: - knowledge and understanding of the legal sectors of reference; - knowledge of the fundamental norms of food safety law, as they emerge in the national and community regulations; - ability to understand goals, contexts and consequences of legislative choices inspired by food safety; - ability to understand jurisprudential judgments related to food law.

Ability to apply knowledge and understanding (applying knowledge and understanding)

The student who has passed the food safety law exam has: - the ability to interpret and apply national and community regulations; - the ability to research on paper and through databases in order to investigate topics of legal interest. The acquisition of the aforementioned requirements will be verified through the following methods: exercises on case law; intermediate tests and final examinations of the individual parts of the course.

Making judgments Students

Who have passed the food safety law exam should have the ability to apply the reference standards to concrete cases in the light of the continuous innovations that food law is experiencing.

Communication skills (communication skills)

The student who has passed the food safety law exam should have: ability to face and resolve the legal issues underlying the food law according to logical legal paths consistent and compatible with the reference system.

Learning skills (learning skills)

The student who has passed the food safety law exam should have:

acquired the juridical methodology to face the new problems that the social and normative evolutions pose daily to the jurist.

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Seminars and exercises on practical cases

Teaching

Teaching methods Frontal lessons; exercises on case law; seminar activities

Attendance

Use of national and Community legislation of reference.

Course books

Among the manuals on the market we recommend the adoption of the text of Luigi Costato, Paolo Borghi, Sebastiano Rizzioli, Valeria Paganizza e Laura Salvi, Compendio di diritto alimentare, Cedam, Milano, ul. ed.

Assessment

This method allows to better grasp and appreciate the punctuality of the display methods, the evaluation and critical abilities as well as the deductive and inductive abilities and above all to appreciate and evaluate the argumentative abilities of the proposed solutions. Oral examination. The expected learning outcomes will be evaluated by formulating three or more questions. The evaluation criteria and scores are determined according to the following scale:

• less than 18/30 - insufficient level: the candidate does not reach any of the learning outcomes foreseen in the point "knowledge and understanding";

• 18-20 / 30 - sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the point "knowledge and understanding";

• 21-23 / 30 - fully sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding" and "applied understanding and understanding";

• 24-26 / 30 - good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied understanding and understanding" and "independent judgment";

• 27-29 / 30 - very good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied understanding and understanding"; "Autonomy of judgment" and "communication skills";

• 30-30 cum laude - excellent level: the candidate fully achieves the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied understanding and understanding"; "Autonomy of judgment"; "Communication skills" and "ability to learn".

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.

Attendance

Use of national and Community legislation of reference.

Course books

Among the manuals on the market we recommend the adoption of the text of Luigi Costato, Paolo Borghi, Sebastiano Rizzioli, Valeria Paganizza e Laura Salvi, Compendio di diritto alimentare, Cedam, Milano, ul. ed.

Assessment

This method allows to better grasp and appreciate the punctuality of the display methods, the evaluation and critical abilities as well as the deductive and inductive abilities and above all to appreciate and evaluate the argumentative abilities of the proposed solutions. Oral examination. The expected learning outcomes will be evaluated by formulating three or more questions. The evaluation criteria and scores are determined according to the following scale:

• less than 18/30 - insufficient level: the candidate does not reach any of the learning outcomes foreseen in the point "knowledge and understanding";

• 18-20 / 30 - sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the point "knowledge and understanding";

• 21-23 / 30 - fully sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding" and "applied understanding and understanding";

• 24-26 / 30 - good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied understanding and understanding" and "independent judgment";

• 27-29 / 30 - very good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied understanding and understanding"; "Autonomy of judgment" and "communication skills";

• 30-30 cum laude - excellent level: the candidate fully achieves the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied understanding and understanding"; "Autonomy of judgment"; "Communication skills" and "ability to learn".

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.