The course gives you the tools for knowledge, comprehension, application and evaluation of Offences in General (book I of the Penal Code)

• The principles of criminal responsibility
• The structure of the offence
• The manifestations of crime
• Principles of criminal liability
• The structure of the crime
• The forms of manifestation of the crime
• International and European criminal law
• The system of sanctions

Constitutional law

Knowledge and understanding

• the criteria for the legitimacy of criminal law, the purpose of the penalty and criminal policy
• general principles of criminal law
• criminal law rules and institutions
• relations with European and international systems

Ability to apply knowledge and understanding

• to research, interpret, enforce criminal law

Autonomy of judgment

• assessing and managing regulatory and jurisprudential complexity

Making judgements

• offer elements of criticism and novelty for interpretation and regulatory creation 

Communication skills

• to draft written and oral comments on judgments and legal opinions
• describe and evaluate the empirical data and its application in the light of legislative, jurisprudential and doctrinal reforms and changes

Learning skills

• basic notions for permanent updating

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Seminars, lectures, exercises, papers, films, blog, podcasting (http://people.uniurb.it/AlessandroBondi/Corso_Diritto_Penale/Obiettivo_corso.html)

Teaching

Lessons, Mind Mapping 3D, guided discussions (Socratic method), tutorials, videos, papers on jurisprudential issues (maximum 4 pages), Moot court

Attendance

Participation in lectures, seminars, tutorials, conferences (unjustified absences max 3 lessons)

Course books

In the student's choice, one of the following manuals:

• Canestrari/Cornacchia/De Simone, Manuale di diritto penale, Parte Generale, latest edition
• Caringella/Salerno, Manuale ragionato di diritto penale, Dike, latest edition
• Fiandaca/Musco, Diritto penale. Parte generale, Zanichelli, latest edition
• Fiore/Fiore Diritto penale. Parte generale (Volume unico), Utet, latest edition
• Garofoli, Manuale di diritto penale, Parte Generale, Nel Diritto Editore, ultima edizione
• Mantovani, Diritto penale. Parte generale, Cedam,latest edition
• Marinucci/Dolcini, Manuale di diritto penale, Parte generale, Giuffrè, latest edition
• Pulitanò, Diritto penale, Giappichelli, latest edition

For everyone except those who use the manual of Garofoli:

• Alessandro Bondi, Tredici passi nel diritto penale europeo, Aras, 2012

Assessment

The test consists of a written test and an oral test.

Written test (multiple-choice test) to verify the knowledge of the basic fundamentals and to offer a gradual approach to passing the exam (you must answer exactly at least 5 questions out of a total of 6).

Oral test to verify the necessary preparation through the reasoned explanation of the institutes and the links between them, also assessing the achievement of an adequate expressive capacity and organization of the speech (three or more questions in 'double step': member of the committee and professor of criminal law).

Optional. Attendees may conduct an intermediate test covering the entire programme, excluding the penalty part and European criminal law. The test will take place the week before the official appeals. In the same week, a review of the main topics carried out during the course (crash course) will be offered.

Optional. At the time of the intermediate test, the participants can also discuss in Moot court (comparison in a simulated process) the opinion pro veritate (Definition) that they have worked out (max 4 pages) on a subject subject subject of judgment. The pro veritate opinion will be assigned within the month of March and must be delivered one month before the intermediate test. The opinion will be corrected. During the course, seminars will be offered to improve your written and oral presentation skills. Written and oral presentation of the opinion pro veritate will be evaluated, increasing the final grade from 0 to 3 points.

The expected learning results will be evaluated by means of an oral exam, based on three questions or more. The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:

less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

18-20: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

21-23: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.

24-26: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.

27-29: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.

30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.

Disabilità e DSA

Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.

A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.

Course books

In the student's choice, one of the following manuals:

• Canestrari/Cornacchia/De Simone, Manuale di diritto penale, Parte Generale, latest edition
• Fiandaca/Musco, Diritto penale. Parte generale, Zanichelli, latest edition
• Fiore/Fiore Diritto penale. Parte generale (Volume unico), Utet, latest edition
• Mantovani, Diritto penale. Parte generale, Cedam,latest edition

For all:

• Alessandro Bondi, Tredici passi nel diritto penale europeo, Aras, 2012

Assessment

The test consists of a written test and an oral test.

Written test (multiple-choice test) to verify the knowledge of the basic fundamentals and to offer a gradual approach to passing the exam (you must answer exactly at least 5 questions out of a total of 6).

Oral test to verify the necessary preparation through the reasoned explanation of the institutes and the links between them, also assessing the achievement of an adequate expressive capacity and organization of the speech (three or more questions in 'double step': member of the committee and professor of criminal law).

Optional. Attendees may conduct an intermediate test covering the entire programme, excluding the penalty part and European criminal law. The test will take place the week before the official appeals. In the same week, a review of the main topics carried out during the course (crash course) will be offered.

Optional. At the time of the intermediate test, the participants can also discuss in Moot court (comparison in a simulated process) the opinion pro veritate (Definition) that they have worked out (max 4 pages) on a subject subject subject of judgment. The pro veritate opinion will be assigned within the month of March and must be delivered one month before the intermediate test. The opinion will be corrected. During the course, seminars will be offered to improve your written and oral presentation skills. Written and oral presentation of the opinion pro veritate will be evaluated, increasing the final grade from 0 to 3 points.

The expected learning results will be evaluated by means of an oral exam, based on three questions or more. The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:

less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

18-20: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

21-23: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.

24-26: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.

27-29: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.

30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”

Disabilità e DSA

Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.

A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.