The course is focused on the study, in a comparative perspective, of private international law, i.e. the system of rules applied in the domestic legal systems of States to regulate private transnational legal relationships.

The general features of the systems of private international law of some European States will be compared. These systems will be also examined in relation to the rules of private international law of the European Union.

Particular attention will be dedicated to the analysis of the Republic of San Marino private international law.

Characters, nature and function of private international law. Rules on "conflict of laws". Rules on jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of foreign civil judgments.  The codification of private international law in the last century. The creation of private international law with a uniform character in the European legal framework.

Comparative analysis of the solution of some general questions of private international law in the Italian, French and Anglo-Saxon systems. The private and procedural international law of the EU. The RSM private international law.

Constitutional Law. Institutions of Private Law

The student must : 

•  demonstrate basic knowledges on International law (KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING)
•  recognize and be able to analyze, following the hierarchy of domestic and international laws, the conflicts between laws, supporting personal arguments (APPLYING KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING)
• show the ability to understand and interpret rules and judgements of different legal systems, using and analyzing sources of International Law (MAKING JUDGEMENTS)
• Show to have the cultural tools sufficient to identify the problems inside the relationships between domestic and international law in a clear way,  properly taking the necessary information, formulating ideas, and providing solutions to problems (COMMUNICATION SKILLS)
• Show the possess of methodological techniques in bibliography and case-law research and demonstrate to have acquired the skills to study with a high degree of autonomy (LEARNING SKILLS).

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Exercitations, Seminars

Teaching

Lectures, seminars

Innovative teaching methods

Debate, Flipped Learning thought platform Moodle-blended

Teaching Working Class

Attendance

--

Course books

U. VILLANI, Diritto internazionale privato: profili generali, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 2019, 96 pp.

Articles uploaded on Moodle Blended platform 

Assessment

Oral exam based on three questions or more. The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:

less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

18-20: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

21-23: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.

24-26: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.

27-29: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.

30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.

Teaching

see attending students

Attendance

see attending students

Course books

U. VILLANI, Diritto internazionale privato: profili generali, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 2019, 96 pp.

Articles uploaded on Moodle Blended platform 

Assessment

Oral exam based on three questions or more. The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:

less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

18-20: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

21-23: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.

24-26: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.

27-29: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.

30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.