Allow the student to acquire sufficient knowledge, including critical and problematic ones, between domestic law, European Union law and international treaties with regard to food law.

Food products between domestic law, European Union law and multilateral international treaties; principles of food law; the market for agricultural and food products; quality systems; production and marketing of food products; the controls.

none

Knowledge and understanding The student who has taken the Food Safety Law exam has: - knowledge and understanding of the relevant legal sectors; - knowledge of the fundamental rules of food safety law, as they emerge in the national and community legal system; - ability to understand purposes, contexts and consequences of legislative choices inspired by food safety; - ability to understand jurisprudential rulings relating to food law. Ability to apply knowledge and understanding The student who has taken the Food Safety Law exam has: - the ability to interpret and apply national and community regulations; - the ability to research on paper and through databases in order to deepen topics of legal interest. The acquisition of the aforementioned requirements will be verified through the following methods: exercises on jurisprudential cases; intermediate tests and final exams of the individual parts of the course. Making judgments The student who has taken the exam in Food Safety Law should have the ability to apply the reference standards to concrete cases in the light of the continuous innovations that food law is experiencing. Communication skills The student who has taken the Food Safety Law exam should have: ability to face and resolve the legal problems underlying the food law according to logical legal paths that are coherent and compatible with the reference system. Learning skills The student who has taken the Food Safety Law exam should have: acquired the legal methodology to face the new problems that social and regulatory evolutions pose to the jurist on a daily basis.

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Seminars and exercises on practical cases

Teaching

Frontal lessons; exercises on case law; seminar activities.

Innovative teaching methods

Flipped learning and debate.

Attendance

Use and study of the relevant national and community legislation.

Course books

Among the manuals on the market we recommend the adoption of the text by Luigi Costato, Paolo Borghi, Sebastiano Rizzioli, Valeria Paganizza and Laura Salvi, Compendio di diritto alimentare, Cedam, Milano, latest edition.

Assessment

Examination tests carried out by oral interview. This modality allows to better grasp and appreciate the punctuality of the exposition modalities, the evaluative and critical abilities as well as the deductive and inductive abilities and above all to appreciate and evaluate the argumentative abilities of the proposed solutions. Oral examination. The expected learning outcomes will be assessed through the formulation of three or more questions. The evaluation criteria and scores are determined according to the following scale: · Less than 18/30 - insufficient level: the candidate does not achieve any of the learning outcomes indicated in the point "knowledge and understanding"; · 18-20 / 30 - sufficient level: the candidate reaches, in particular, the learning outcomes indicated in the point "knowledge and understanding"; · 21-23 / 30 - fully sufficient level: the candidate reaches, in particular, the learning outcomes specified in the points "knowledge and understanding" and "applied knowledge and understanding"; · 24-26 / 30 - good level: the candidate reaches, in particular, the learning outcomes indicated in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied knowledge and understanding" and "independent judgment"; · 27-29 / 30 - very good level: the candidate reaches, in particular, the learning outcomes indicated in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied knowledge and understanding"; "Independent judgment" and "communication skills"; - 30-30 cum laude - excellent level: the candidate fully achieves the learning outcomes indicated in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied knowledge and understanding"; "Autonomy of judgment"; "Communication skills" and "ability to learn".

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.

Teaching

Use and study of the relevant national and community legislation.

Attendance

Use and study of the relevant national and community legislation.

Course books

Among the manuals on the market we recommend the adoption of the text by Luigi Costato, Paolo Borghi, Sebastiano Rizzioli, Valeria Paganizza and Laura Salvi, Compendium of food law, Cedam, Milan, latest edition

Assessment

Examination tests carried out by oral interview. This modality allows to better grasp and appreciate the punctuality of the exposition modalities, the evaluative and critical abilities as well as the deductive and inductive abilities and above all to appreciate and evaluate the argumentative abilities of the proposed solutions. Oral examination. The expected learning outcomes will be assessed through the formulation of three or more questions. The evaluation criteria and scores are determined according to the following scale: · Less than 18/30 - insufficient level: the candidate does not achieve any of the learning outcomes indicated in the point "knowledge and understanding"; · 18-20 / 30 - sufficient level: the candidate reaches, in particular, the learning outcomes indicated in the point "knowledge and understanding"; · 21-23 / 30 - fully sufficient level: the candidate reaches, in particular, the learning outcomes specified in the points "knowledge and understanding" and "applied knowledge and understanding"; · 24-26 / 30 - good level: the candidate reaches, in particular, the learning outcomes indicated in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied knowledge and understanding" and "independent judgment"; · 27-29 / 30 - very good level: the candidate reaches, in particular, the learning outcomes indicated in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied knowledge and understanding"; "Independent judgment" and "communication skills"; - 30-30 cum laude - excellent level: the candidate fully achieves the learning outcomes indicated in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied knowledge and understanding"; "Autonomy of judgment"; "Communication skills" and "ability to learn".

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.