The course intends to deepen the study of some crime figures of the "special part" of the Italian criminal code. Most attention will be paid to the methodological profiles of the survey, the intersections with the "general part" institutes and the relationships between theory and application practice.

1) Crimes against the person

2) Crimes against property

3) Crimes against the public administration

Criminal Law first part

The course aims to provide the student with the necessary knowledge to allow him to correctly interpret the reference legislation and to identify the most appropriate solutions to the cases that will be proposed.

The student must therefore demonstrate:

1) institutional knowledge of the reference legislation and mastery of its interpretation techniques (knwoledge and understanding);

2) mastery of the argumentative framework necessary to support arguments in relation to the interpretative nodes of the matter, with particular reference to the use of jurisprudential law (applying knowledge)

3) knowledge of the methods of retrieval and overall analysis of relevant information (making judgment);

4) the ability to expose their basic knowledge and the solutions of the questions that will be proposed to them (communication skills) with logic and completeness, language properties and without ambiguity;

5) full mastery of the learning skills necessary for the continuation of the study independently (learning skill)

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Seminars and monographic study meetings.

Teaching

Lectures, exercises and seminar meetings.

Innovative teaching methods

Flipped lesson

Attendance

No obligation

Course books

R. Bartoli / M.Pellissero / S.Seminara, Criminal law. Features of the special section, Giappichelli, Turin, 2022 ( crimes against person, property and public administration). 

Suggested reading. Alessandro Manzoni, Storia della Colonna Infame, Sellerio, Palermo, 1981, with a note by Leonardo Sciascia

Assessment

Oral examination. The chosen method allows you to fully ascertain both the acquisition of all the knowledge relating to the course, and the mastery of the technical-legal language and individual communication skills.

The evaluation criteria and scores are determined according to the following scale:

less than 18/30: insufficient level. The candidate does not achieve any of the learning outcomes provided for in the point "knowledge and understanding";
18-20 / 30: sufficient level. In particular, the candidate achieves the learning outcomes envisaged in the point "knowledge and understanding";
21-23 / 30: fully sufficient level. In particular, the candidate achieves the learning outcomes envisaged in the points "knowledge and understanding" and "applied knowledge and understanding";
24-26 / 30: good level. In particular, the candidate achieves the learning outcomes envisaged in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied knowledge and understanding" and "independent judgment";
27-29 / 30: very good level. In particular, the candidate achieves the learning outcomes envisaged in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied knowledge and understanding"; "Independent judgment" and "communication skills";
30-30 cum laude: excellent level. The candidate fully achieves the learning outcomes envisaged in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied knowledge and understanding"; "Autonomy of judgment"; "Communication skills" and "ability to learn".

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.

Teaching

Lectures, exercises and seminar meetings.

Attendance

No obligation

Course books

1) G. Fiandaca / E. Musco, Diritto penale. Parte speciale. Volume II, tomo primo. I delitti contro la persona, ZANICHELLI, Bologna, ult. ed.

2) G. Fiandaca / E. Musco, Diritto penale. Parte speciale. Volume II, tomo secondo, I delitti contro il patrimonio, ZANICHELLI, Bologna, ult. ed. In alternativa, ad esclusiva scelta dello studente, si potrà utilizzare anche F. Mantovani, Diritto penale. Parte speciale. Delitti contro il patrimonio, CEDAM, Padova, ult. ed. 

3)  Mario Romano, I delitti contro la pubblica amministrazione. I delitti dei pubblici ufficiali. Art. 314-335 -bis cod. pen., Giuffrè, Francis Lefebvre, 2019, da pag. 1 a pag. 399 (questo testo è aggiornato alla Legge n. 3 del 9 gennaio 2019).

Assessment

Oral examination. The chosen method allows you to fully ascertain both the acquisition of all the knowledge relating to the course, and the mastery of the technical-legal language and individual communication skills.

The evaluation criteria and scores are determined according to the following scale:

less than 18/30: insufficient level. The candidate does not achieve any of the learning outcomes provided for in the point "knowledge and understanding";
18-20 / 30: sufficient level. In particular, the candidate achieves the learning outcomes envisaged in the point "knowledge and understanding";
21-23 / 30: fully sufficient level. In particular, the candidate achieves the learning outcomes envisaged in the points "knowledge and understanding" and "applied knowledge and understanding";
24-26 / 30: good level. In particular, the candidate achieves the learning outcomes envisaged in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied knowledge and understanding" and "independent judgment";
27-29 / 30: very good level. In particular, the candidate achieves the learning outcomes envisaged in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied knowledge and understanding"; "Independent judgment" and "communication skills";
30-30 cum laude: excellent level. The candidate fully achieves the learning outcomes envisaged in the points "knowledge and understanding"; "Applied knowledge and understanding"; "Autonomy of judgment"; "Communication skills" and "ability to learn".

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.