The course aims to provide an exhaustive framework of traffic and road safety rules which includes international conventions, European regulations and national legislation. The course also aims to begin understanding the technological and regulatory evolution that the road and vehicles are experiencing today. In this vision, the new panorama of road traffic is the subject of specific in-depth analysis, both with regards to assisted driving vehicles and future autonomous driving vehicles. For these training objectives, students are involved in in-depth courses on issues relating to the responsibility profiles of drivers, road managers and vehicle manufacturers, which are significantly different from the current ones, precisely due to the technological innovations adopted to international and national level.

a) Traffic rules. Road traffic consists of the flow of vehicles, pedestrians and animals that move on the roads, alternating movement with stopping and stopping. The methods by which movement, arrest, stops and stops are carried out are regulated by the Highway Code (Legislative Decree 285/1992) by the relevant Implementing Regulation (Presidential Decree 495/1992); b) The rules that transpose Regulations and Directives of the European Union which in many cases end up integrating the Code with the discipline that the code reserves, by title, for the various "actors" of traffic: the road, the vehicles, the drivers , in almost all of his titles;

c)   Road accidents - The introduction of road homicide crimes into the legal system, art.589 bis of the Criminal Code. and the crime of personal injury on the road, art.590 bis of the Criminal Code, which represent the predominant part of law 41/2016, constitutes a novelty of great importance, which reverses the relationship between the rules of the penal code and that of traffic. as regards the definition of the profiles of guilt and the identification of the subjects called to answer for the crimes introduced. Even civil legislation, which can be used for financial compensation actions, consequently takes on new connotations and new evaluation parameters, not only for the drivers of the vehicles involved, but for all other potentially interested parties, such as the bodies that own the vehicle. road, whose tasks and obligations have been rewritten by Directive 96/2008 and implemented with Legislative Decree 35/2011. Tasks and obligations which are then also expanded by Legislative Decree 81/2008, dedicated to safety at work and by the inter-ministerial decree of 22 January 2019, on the procedures for affixing, reviewing and removing road construction site signs d) Compulsory insurance for damages resulting from the road traffic of motor vehicles.  It had been introduced into the legal system with law   n. 990 of 1969, now completely rewritten by Legislative Decree 209 of 2005, which provided for new institutions and dedicated procedures, which leave residual value to civil law. These particular adaptations, which have led to copious and complex legislation, have been determined by the specificity of the sector (circulation), which is reflected in the regulations called to regulate it.

e)  The international rules transposed into the internal legislation, relating to the admission to circulation of vehicles registered in non-EU countries, the requirements and driving limitations for drivers and the safety requirements of particular transports; f) Smart Roads and New Generation Vehicles.  New generation vehicles, both those equipped with on-board systems that influence driving, defined as ADAS by the European Parliament Resolution of 14 November 2017 and, even more so, those with automatic driving, open up new scenarios for road traffic and call for new rules. Likewise, the Smart Roads that will have to accommodate their circulation pose new scenarios to define their skills and responsibilities, as already expressed in the MIT decree of 28 February 2028

Nobody

Knowledge and understanding The Law graduate who has taken the Transport Law exam has: -complete knowledge and ability to understand basic legal sectors; - in-depth knowledge of the fundamental international, European and national regulations governing the various types of transport;  knowledge of the judicial and extrajudicial resolution procedures for disputes relating to the transport of goods and travellers; - ability to understand the evolution of the entire logistics and intermodality of transport, which sees road transport as the beginning and end of each shipment; - ability to develop legal documentation in the context of negotiation, extrajudicial and judicial contexts relating to logistics and transport.
Ability to apply knowledge and understanding (applying knowledge and understanding) The Law graduate who has taken the Transport Law exam has: - the ability to research and correctly interpret dedicated international, European and national standards; - the ability to coordinate the different regulatory sources, the value of which varies depending on the type of transport. The acquisition of the aforementioned requirements will be verified through the following methods: exercises on jurisprudential cases; intermediate tests and final exams of individual courses; the result of any internships and other training experiences organized as part of the course of study. Making judgements (making judgements) The Law graduate who has taken the Transport Law exam has: - ability to interpret, analyze case studies and qualify the relationship between real facts and legal cases, in order to be able to identify, represent and resolve problems connected to the protection of the legal figures involved in the litigation; - ability to develop management models for public or private transport of goods or travellers, and the determination of obligations related to legality and safety in their broadest sense:
Communication skills (communication skills) The law graduate who has taken the ROAD TRAFFIC LAW AND ROAD SAFETY exam has: ability to understand all the legal problems relating to the transport of goods and passengers, the breadth of which is constantly expanding, favored by the evolution of technologies, which make highly innovative methods possible and which are not easy to define the legal figures, typically responsible for transport . Learning skills (learning skills) Law graduates who have taken the ROAD TRAFFIC LAW AND ROAD SAFETY exam have acquired: - the basic skills and tools for the constant updating of one's own civil, criminal and administrative skills acquired and which are relevant in the sector - the ability to understand the complexity of legal phenomena in the field of goods or traveler transport relationships; -the ability to independently follow the evolution of international, European and national sources dedicated to transport and to coordinate them correctly to search for the legislation adhering to the actual fact involved.

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Insights and debates as part of the Course in light of the upcoming legislative changes already announced.

Teaching

Teaching methods The course will take place in the First Semester and will consist of lectures. Study texts ROAD TRAFFIC LAW by Balduino SIMONE - DIKE editions Mode of verification Every student, whether attending or not, has the right to take the final exam exclusively through an oral discussion on the topics indicated in points a) to f)i. The oral interview method allows us to evaluate in the most complete way, in addition to the student's communication skills, the acquisition of the analytical and critical skills required of the student in consideration of the complexity of the topics and arguments covered by the course of which he must demonstrate the knowledge and understanding.
In the aforementioned discussion, the expected learning outcomes will be assessed by asking three or more questions. Evaluation criteria and scores are determined according to the following scale: less than 18/30 - insufficient level: the candidate does not achieve any of the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" point; 18-20/30 - sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" point; 21-23/30 - fully sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding" and "applied knowledge and understanding"; 24-26/30 - good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding” and “independence of judgement”; 27-29/30 - very good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding”; “independence of judgement” and “communication skills”; 30-30 cum laude - excellent level: the candidate fully achieves the learning outcomes set out in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding”; “independence of judgement”; “communication skills” and “ability to learn”.

Attendance

Nobody

Course books

ROAD TRAFFIC LAW by Balduino SIMONE - DIKE editions

Assessment

Every student, whether attending or not, has the right to take the final exam exclusively through an oral discussion on the topics indicated in points a) to f)i. The oral interview method allows us to evaluate in the most complete way, in addition to the student's communication skills, the acquisition of the analytical and critical skills required of the student in consideration of the complexity of the topics and arguments covered by the course of which he must demonstrate the knowledge and understanding. In the aforementioned discussion, the expected learning outcomes will be assessed by asking three or more questions. Evaluation criteria and scores are determined according to the following scale:
less than 18/30 - insufficient level: the candidate does not achieve any of the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" point; 18-20/30 - sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" point; 21-23/30 - fully sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding" and "applied knowledge and understanding"; 24-26/30 - good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding” and “independence of judgement”; 27-29/30 - very good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding”; “independence of judgement” and “communication skills”; 30-30 cum laude - excellent level: the candidate fully achieves the learning outcomes set out in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding”; “independence of judgement”; “communication skills” and “ability to learn”.

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.

Attendance

Nobody

Course books

ROAD TRAFFIC LAW by Balduino SIMONE - DIKE editions

Assessment

Every student, whether attending or not, has the right to take the final exam exclusively through an oral discussion on the topics indicated in points a) to f)i. The oral interview method allows us to evaluate in the most complete way, in addition to the student's communication skills, the acquisition of the analytical and critical skills required of the student in consideration of the complexity of the topics and arguments covered by the course of which he must demonstrate the knowledge and understanding. In the aforementioned discussion, the expected learning outcomes will be assessed by asking three or more questions. Evaluation criteria and scores are determined according to the following scale:
less than 18/30 - insufficient level: the candidate does not achieve any of the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" point; 18-20/30 - sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" point; 21-23/30 - fully sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding" and "applied knowledge and understanding"; 24-26/30 - good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding” and “independence of judgement”; 27-29/30 - very good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding”; “independence of judgement” and “communication skills”; 30-30 cum laude - excellent level: the candidate fully achieves the learning outcomes set out in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding”; “independence of judgement”; “communication skills” and “ability to learn”.

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.