CIVIL PROCEDURE
DIRITTO PROCESSUALE CIVILE
A.Y. | Credits |
---|---|
2017/2018 | 14 |
Lecturer | Office hours for students | |
---|---|---|
Andrea Giussani | before and after lectures |
Assigned to the Degree Course
Date | Time | Classroom / Location |
---|
Date | Time | Classroom / Location |
---|
Learning Objectives
Knowledge of and capability to interpret statutory provisions on dispute resolution in the code of civil procedure, the Constitution and the relevant special statutes
Program
General part: civil dispute resolution rules in the code of civil procedure, the Constitution and the relevant special statutes, as interpreted in case law and doctrinal analysis, and perspectives of their reform
Special part: evolution of special procedural rules for business litigation
Bridging Courses
Institutions of private law, Consitutional law
Learning Achievements (Dublin Descriptors)
Knowledge of dispute resolution in civil courts of justice and capability to develop legal documents in judicial environment, understanding in interdisciplinary context, capability of making judgments, communication and learing skills
Teaching Material
The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it
Supporting Activities
Seminars
Teaching, Attendance, Course Books and Assessment
- Teaching
Lectures
- Attendance
Knowledge of basics of bridging courses (Institutions of private law, Consitutional law)
- Course books
Biavati, Argomenti di diritto processuale civile, BUP, latest edition
Giussani, Corso di diritto processuale delle imprese, BUP, 2015
- Assessment
The expected learning results will be evaluated by means of an oral exam, based on three questions or more, one of them chosen by the student on the special part. The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:
less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
18-20: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
21-23: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.
24-26: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.
27-29: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.
30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.
- Disabilità e DSA
Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.
A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.
Additional Information for Non-Attending Students
- Teaching
Materials on moodle platform
- Attendance
Knowledge of basics of bridging courses (Institutions of private law, Consitutional law)
- Course books
Biavati, Argomenti di diritto processuale civile, BUP, latest edition
Giussani, Corso di diritto processuale delle imprese, BUP, in press
- Assessment
The expected learning results will be evaluated by means of an oral exam, based on three questions or more, one of them chosen by the student on the special part. The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:
less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
18-20: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
21-23: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.
24-26: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.
27-29: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.
30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.
- Disabilità e DSA
Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.
A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.
Notes
The student can request to sit the final exam in English with an alternative bibliography
« back | Last update: 23/02/2018 |