The course gives you the tools for knowledge, comprehension, application and evaluation of Offences in General (book I of the Penal Code)

• The principles of criminal responsibility
• The structure of the offence
• The manifestations of crime
• Principles of criminal liability
• The structure of the crime
• The forms of manifestation of the crime
• International and European criminal law
• The system of sanctions

Constitutional law

• write comments on judgments and legal opinions 
• application adapting to legislative reforms and jurisprudential and doctrinal changes,

Learning skills

• Basics for permanent updating

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Seminars, lectures, exercises, papers, films, blog, podcasting (http://people.uniurb.it/AlessandroBondi/Corso_Diritto_Penale/Obiettivo_corso.html)

Teaching

Lessons, Mind Mapping 3D, guided discussions (Socratic method), tutorials, videos, papers on jurisprudential issues (maximum 4 pages), Moot court

Attendance

Participation in lectures, seminars, tutorials, conferences (unjustified absences max 3 lessons)

Course books

In the student's choice, one of the following manuals:

• Canestrari/Cornacchia/De Simone, Manuale di diritto penale, Parte Generale, latest edition
• Fiandaca/Musco, Diritto penale. Parte generale, Zanichelli, latest edition
• Fiore/Fiore Diritto penale. Parte generale (Volume unico), Utet, latest edition
• Garofoli, Manuale di diritto penale, Parte Generale, Nel Diritto Editore, ultima edizione
• Mantovani, Diritto penale. Parte generale, Cedam,latest edition
• Marinucci/Dolcini, Manuale di diritto penale, Parte generale, Giuffrè, latest edition
• Pulitanò, Diritto penale, Giappichelli, latest edition

For everyone except those who use the manual of Garofoli:

• Alessandro Bondi, Tredici passi nel diritto penale europeo, Aras, 2012

Assessment

The test consists of a written test and an oral test.

Written test (multiple-choice test) to verify the knowledge of the basic fundamentals and to offer a gradual approach to passing the exam (you must answer exactly at least 5 questions out of a total of 6).

Oral test to verify the necessary preparation through the reasoned explanation of the institutes and the links between them, also assessing the achievement of an adequate expressive capacity and organization of the speech (three or more questions in 'double step': member of the committee and professor of criminal law).

Optional. Attendees may conduct an intermediate test covering the entire programme, excluding the penalty part and European criminal law. The test will take place the week before the official appeals. In the same week, a review of the main topics carried out during the course (crash course) will be offered.

Optional. At the time of the intermediate test, the participants can also discuss in Moot court (comparison in a simulated process) the opinion pro veritate (Definition) that they have worked out (max 4 pages) on a subject subject subject of judgment. The pro veritate opinion will be assigned within the month of March and must be delivered one month before the intermediate test. The opinion will be corrected. During the course, seminars will be offered to improve your written and oral presentation skills. Written and oral presentation of the opinion pro veritate will be evaluated, increasing the final grade from 0 to 3 points.

The expected learning results will be evaluated by means of an oral exam, based on three questions or more. The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:

less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

18-20: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.

21-23: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.

24-26: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.

27-29: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.

30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.

Course books

In the student's choice, one of the following manuals:

• Canestrari/Cornacchia/De Simone, Manuale di diritto penale, Parte Generale, latest edition
• Fiandaca/Musco, Diritto penale. Parte generale, Zanichelli, latest edition
• Fiore/Fiore Diritto penale. Parte generale (Volume unico), Utet, latest edition
• Mantovani, Diritto penale. Parte generale, Cedam,latest edition

For all:

• Alessandro Bondi, Tredici passi nel diritto penale europeo, Aras, 2012

Assessment

L'esame prevede una prova scritta e una prova orale.

Prova scritta (test a risposte multiple) per verificare la conoscenza dei fondamenti di base e offrire un approccio graduale al superamento dell'esame (occorre rispondere esattamente ad almeno 5 domande su 6 totali).

Prova orale per verificare la preparazione necessaria attraverso l’esplicazione ragionata degli istituti e dei nessi tra essi esistenti, valutando anche il raggiungimento di un’adeguata capacità espressiva e di organizzazione del discorso (tre o più domande in 'doppio passaggio': membro della commissione e professore di diritto penale).

I criteri di valutazione e i punteggi sono determinati secondo la seguente scala:

• meno di 18/30: livello di competenza insufficiente. ll candidato non raggiunge nessuno dei risultati di apprendimento previsti al punto “conoscenza e capacità di comprensione”;
• 18-20/30: livello di competenza sufficiente. Il candidato raggiunge, in particolare, i risultati di apprendimento previsti al punto “conoscenza e capacità di comprensione”;
• 21-23/30: livello di competenza pienamente sufficiente. Il candidato raggiunge, in particolare, i risultati di apprendimento previsti ai punti “conoscenza e capacità di comprensione” e “conoscenza e capacità di comprensione applicate”;
• 24-26/30: livello di competenza: buono. Il candidato raggiunge, in particolare, i risultati di apprendimento previsti ai punti “conoscenza e capacità di comprensione”; “conoscenza e capacità di comprensione applicate” e “autonomia di giudizio”;
• 27-29/30: livello di competenza molto buono. Il candidato raggiunge, in particolare, i risultati di apprendimento previsti ai punti “conoscenza e capacità di comprensione”; “conoscenza e capacità di comprensione applicate”; “autonomia di giudizio” e “abilità comunicative”;
• 30-30 e lode: livello di competenza eccellente. Il candidato raggiunge pienamente i risultati di apprendimento previsti ai punti “conoscenza e capacità di comprensione”; “conoscenza e capacità di comprensione applicate”; “autonomia di giudizio”; “abilità comunicative” e “capacità di apprendere”. 

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.