PUBLIC SECURITY AND ROMAN CRIMINAL LAW mutuato
ORDINE PUBBLICO E DIRITTO CRIMINALE ROMANO
| A.Y. | Credits |
|---|---|
| 2023/2024 | 6 |
| Lecturer | Office hours for students | |
|---|---|---|
| Maria Luisa Biccari | After the lesson or on request via email, even online (by meet or zoom). |
| Teaching in foreign languages |
|---|
|
Course with optional materials in a foreign language
English
This course is entirely taught in Italian. Study materials can be provided in the foreign language and the final exam can be taken in the foreign language. |
Assigned to the Degree Course
| Date | Time | Classroom / Location |
|---|
| Date | Time | Classroom / Location |
|---|
Learning Objectives
The course aims to illustrate the main issues related to the need for security and public order, declined according to a historical path that starts from ancient Rome and develops through a continuous relationship (comparison and contrast) between the ancient world and the modern world.
Program
1) Security, public order and Roman law.
2) Criminal repression in ancient Rome.
3) The function of punishment.
4) The police system.
Bridging Courses
None.
Learning Achievements (Dublin Descriptors)
A) Knowledge and understanding: knowledge and understanding of the basics of the subject as well as of the main dynamics that have produced and accompanied its historical development.
B) Applied knowledge and understanding: ability to critically examine the fundamental lines of the historical evolution of the institutions, also in an interdisciplinary dimension, and to make connections between the different parts of the programme.
C) Autonomy of judgement (making judgements): ability to integrate one's own knowledge with the topics examined in depth in lectures and to carry out autonomous evaluations in contexts of discussion and debate.
D) Communication skills: ability to organise the notions learnt in a rational and complete manner, using appropriate legal language.
E) Learning skills: ability to approach study independently and to update one's knowledge.
Teaching Material
The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it
Supporting Activities
Self-assessment tests, consisting of open-ended and multiple-choice answers, may be conducted during the course to enable students to assess the degree of their preparation.
Seminars on specific topics.
Teaching, Attendance, Course Books and Assessment
- Teaching
The course will be articulated in traditional mode (lectures) and in innovative-experimental mode (Flipped Learning technique teaching, hybrid seminar forms also through the use of digital touch boards).
The reception for students, aimed at providing clarifications on the methods and topics covered in the lectures, will be held in a mixed mode (presential and distance), by appointment via e-mail: maria.biccari@uniurb.it
- Innovative teaching methods
Self-assessment tests, consisting of open-ended and multiple-choice answers, may be conducted during the course to enable students to assess the degree of their preparation.
Seminars on specific topics.
- Attendance
Attendance to the course is not compulsory, except at least 75% of the lessons to take the intermediate written test.
However active participation in class activities is highly recommended.
- Course books
- Materials that the lecturer will make available to attending students during the course and personal notes of the lessons.
- The following study text is recommended: L. Solidoro (ed.), Regole e garanzie nel processo criminale romano, Torino (Giappichelli) 2016.
- Assessment
The final exam (an oral interview) is based on three or more questions on different topics covered by the course. This method allows you to better understand and appreciate the level of understanding of the institutions, the punctuality and accuracy of the presentation, as well as the ability to develop critical arguments and to reason on practical cases.
The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:
less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
18-20/30: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
21-23/30: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.
24-26/30: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.
27-29/30: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.
30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.
- Disabilità e DSA
Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.
A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.
Additional Information for Non-Attending Students
- Course books
L. Solidoro (a cura di), Regole e garanzie nel processo criminale romano, Torino (Giappichelli) 2016.
- Assessment
The final exam (an oral interview) is based on three or more questions on different topics covered by the course. This method allows you to better understand and appreciate the level of understanding of the institutions, the punctuality and accuracy of the presentation, as well as the ability to develop critical arguments and to reason on practical cases.
The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:
less than 18/30: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
18-20/30: competence level sufficient. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”.
21-23/30: competence level satisfactory. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”.
24-26/30: competence level good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”.
27-29/30: competence level very good. In particular, the student attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “communication skills”.
30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments” and “learning skills”.
- Disabilità e DSA
Le studentesse e gli studenti che hanno registrato la certificazione di disabilità o la certificazione di DSA presso l'Ufficio Inclusione e diritto allo studio, possono chiedere di utilizzare le mappe concettuali (per parole chiave) durante la prova di esame.
A tal fine, è necessario inviare le mappe, due settimane prima dell’appello di esame, alla o al docente del corso, che ne verificherà la coerenza con le indicazioni delle linee guida di ateneo e potrà chiederne la modifica.
Notes
The student can request to sit the final exam in English with an alternative bibliography.
| « back | Last update: 19/07/2023 |
