SOCIOLOGY OF SOCIAL INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION
SOCIOLOGIA DELL'INCLUSIONE E DELL'ESCLUSIONE SOCIALE
A.Y. | Credits |
---|---|
2023/2024 | 6 |
Lecturer | Office hours for students | |
---|---|---|
Ariela Francesca Pagani | Prof. Ariela Pagani receives students (in person or online) on Tuesdays at 11.30 by appointment, writing to ariela.pagani@uniurb.it |
Assigned to the Degree Course
Date | Time | Classroom / Location |
---|
Date | Time | Classroom / Location |
---|
Learning Objectives
The course aims to provide students with the theoretical knowledge and critical-interpretative tools to understand and analyze the processes of social marginality by providing a historical and theoretical contextualization and deepening the most recent social changes that give rise to new forms of social inclusion and exclusion.
Program
The course aims to deepen the process of marginality and the concepts of social inclusion and exclusion. The evolution of the concept of marginality is retraced and the relationship between marginality and modernization is examined, highlighting the different meanings that the concept of marginality assumes. This will make it possible to better understand the definitions and characteristics of the concepts of social inclusion and exclusion and to examine the different spheres (economic, social, political-institutional, cultural) and levels (individual, family, collective) of exclusion as well as the social categories most exposed to this phenomenon. During the lessons, the main approaches and data available at the national and international levels on exclusion will be examined.
Bridging Courses
//
Learning Achievements (Dublin Descriptors)
Learning outcomes:
a) Knowledge and understanding: Demonstrate the comprehension of the main contents of the course, through a study that is not merely mnemonic.
b) Applying knowledge and understanding: Discuss theoretical problems and know how to expose them with properties of language and argumentation. Being able to make interdisciplinary connections. Extract from the theoretical contents and practical examples presented a "situated" knowledge that can be related to professional experience.
c) Making judgements: Demonstrate the ability to autonomously integrate the knowledge and develop a critical spirit.
d) Communication skills: Know how to present theoretical concepts in an effective and clear way. Acquire the technical language of the discipline.
e) Learning skills: Develop the ability to independently manage and critically evaluate one's own study method. Learn from the comparison with the teacher and other students.
Teaching Material
The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it
Supporting Activities
Supplementary seminars and other activities of possible interest to students will be communicated in class.
Teaching, Attendance, Course Books and Assessment
- Teaching
Frontal lessons.
Interactive activity.
Integrated digital teaching (uploading materials to Moodle > Blended Learning).
- Innovative teaching methods
- Attendance
//
- Course books
- Giardiello, M. (2011). Sociologia della marginalità. Il contributo di Gino Germani. Carocci Editore.
- Tuorto. D. (2017). Esclusione sociale. Uno sguardo sociologico. Pearson.
- The course slides will be made available on the Moodle > Blended Learning platform and are an integral part of the exam material.
- Assessment
Verification of learning will take place through an oral interview. The assessment will focus on knowledge of the contents of the textbooks and any other teaching materials provided by the teacher. The ability to re-elaborate and critically argue the topics and the property of language will be particularly valued.
Excellent evaluation: in-depth and articulated knowledge of the topics and authors treated; the ability to make connections between topics; the ability to develop critical reflections in support of the argument; the ability to problematize and contextualize theories at a historical level; the ability to support the arguments with
Good evaluation: a good general knowledge of the topics and authors treated; a relative critical and connecting capacity of the topics dealt with; appropriate language and the use of some specific terms of the discipline; the ability to formulate examples starting from the stimuli provided by the teacher.
Sufficient evaluation: a purely mnemonic knowledge but which demonstrates at least a sufficient level of understanding of the topics dealt with; presence of slight gaps in the knowledge of the historical and social phenomena dealt with; limited but still understandable expression; sufficient knowledge of the specific language of the discipline.
Insufficient evaluation: little or no knowledge of the contents and authors treated; incapacity of critical argumentation and problematization; training gaps; use of inappropriate language.
- Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)
Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.
To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.
Additional Information for Non-Attending Students
- Teaching
Individual study.
- Attendance
//
- Course books
- Giardiello, M. (2011). Sociologia della marginalità. Il contributo di Gino Germani. Carocci Editore.
- Tuorto. D. (2017). Esclusione sociale. Uno sguardo sociologico. Pearson.
- The course slides will be made available on the Moodle > Blended Learning platform and are an integral part of the exam material.
- Assessment
Verification of learning will take place through an oral interview. The assessment will focus on knowledge of the contents of the textbooks and any other teaching materials provided by the teacher. The ability to re-elaborate and critically argue the topics and the property of language will be particularly valued.
Excellent evaluation: in-depth and articulated knowledge of the topics and authors treated; the ability to make connections between topics; the ability to develop critical reflections in support of the argument; the ability to problematize and contextualize theories at a historical level; the ability to support the arguments with
Good evaluation: a good general knowledge of the topics and authors treated; a relative critical and connecting capacity of the topics dealt with; appropriate language and the use of some specific terms of the discipline; the ability to formulate examples starting from the stimuli provided by the teacher.
Sufficient evaluation: a purely mnemonic knowledge but which demonstrates at least a sufficient level of understanding of the topics dealt with; presence of slight gaps in the knowledge of the historical and social phenomena dealt with; limited but still understandable expression; sufficient knowledge of the specific language of the discipline.
Insufficient evaluation: little or no knowledge of the contents and authors treated; incapacity of critical argumentation and problematization; training gaps; use of inappropriate language.
- Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)
Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.
To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.
« back | Last update: 22/09/2023 |