To know the fundamental concepts of administrative law (public body, organisation, structure, functioning, tools for achieving the public interests).

During the lessons I'll teach these topics:

1) The national and european principles of the administrative law;

2) The concept of individual legal situation;

3) The definition of public body;

4) The phases of administrative procedure;

5)  The administrative act and its forms of invalidity;

 6) The forms of responsability of public bodies and public employees;

7) The public goods;

8) The public contracts and services.

Recommended and non-binding: Constitutional Law.

A) Knowledge and understanding: the student must demonstrate that he has assimilated the fundamental principles of public security administrative law.

B) Applying knowledge and understanding: the student must demonstrate that he has sufficient expository mastery about this matter.

C) Making judgements:  the student must demonstrate the ability to synthesize the acquired knowledge, through the integration of relevant data.

D) Communication skills: the student must demonstrate the ability to formulate their conclusions on specific issues in a sufficiently clear and concise manner,  also providing solutions to particular questions.

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Periodic reviews of the main concepts of the matter.

Teaching

Conducting face-to-face lessons.

Attendance

Nothing.

Course books

Obligatory texts:

- D. Sorace e S. Torricelli, Diritto delle amministrazioni pubbliche, Bologna, Il Mulino, 2023; 

-  F. de Leonardis, Art. 1. I principi generali dell'attività amministrativa, in A. Romano (a cura di), L'azione amministrativa, Torino, Giappichelli, 2016 (only from pag. 1 to pag. 112); G. della Cananea e C. Franchini, I principi dell'amministrazione europea, Torino, Giappichelli, 2017 (only from pag. 57 to pag. 119).

Assessment

Oral exam. 

The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:
• less than 18: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results
described in “knowledge and understanding”;
• 18-20: competence level sufficient. The student attains the learning results described in
“knowledge and understanding”;
• 21-23: competence level satisfactory. The student attains the learning results described in
“knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”;
• 24-26: competence level good. The student attains the learning results described in “knowledge
and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”;
• 27-29: competence level very good. The student attains the learning results described in
“knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments”
and “communication skills”;
• 30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results
described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making
judgments” and “learning skills”.

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.

Teaching

//

Attendance

Nothing.

Course books

Obligatory texts:

- D. Sorace e S. Torricelli, Diritto delle amministrazioni pubbliche, Bologna, Il Mulino, 2023; 

-  F. de Leonardis, Art. 1. I principi generali dell'attività amministrativa, in A. Romano (a cura di), L'azione amministrativa, Torino, Giappichelli, 2016 (only from pag. 1 to pag. 112); G. della Cananea e C. Franchini, I principi dell'amministrazione europea, Torino, Giappichelli, 2017 (only from pag. 57 to pag. 119).

Assessment

Oral exam.

The evaluation criteria and the scale of marks are as follows:
• less than 18: competence level insufficient. The student doesn’t reach the learning results
described in “knowledge and understanding”;
• 18-20: competence level sufficient. The student attains the learning results described in
“knowledge and understanding”;
• 21-23: competence level satisfactory. The student attains the learning results described in
“knowledge and understanding” and in “applied knowledge and understanding”;
• 24-26: competence level good. The student attains the learning results described in “knowledge
and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding” and “making judgments”;
• 27-29: competence level very good. The student attains the learning results described in
“knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making judgments”
and “communication skills”;
• 30-30 with honours: competence level excellent. The student fully attains the learning results
described in “knowledge and understanding”, “applied knowledge and understanding”, “making
judgments” and “learning skills”.

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.