Knowledge of and capability to interpret statutory provisions on dispute resolution in the code of civil procedure, the Constitution and the relevant special statutes

General part: civil dispute resolution rules in the code of civil procedure, the Constitution and the relevant special statutes, as interpreted in case law and doctrinal analysis, and perspectives of their reform

Special part: evolution of civil justice

Institutions of private law, Constitutional law

Knowledge of dispute resolution in civil courts of justice and capability to: a) develop legal documents in judicial environment; b) originally develop or apply ideas often in a research context (knowledge and understanding); c) apply problem solving abilities in new or unfamiliar environments within broader (or multidisciplinary) contexts (applying knowledge and understanding); d) integrate knowledge and handle complexity, and formulate judgements with incomplete data (making judgments); e) communicate  their conclusions and the underpinning knowledge and rationale (restricted scope) to specialist and non-specialist audiences (monologue) (communication skills); f) study in a manner that may be largely self-directed or autonomous (learning skills)

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer in addition to recommended textbooks (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises, bibliography) and communications from the lecturer specific to the course can be found inside the Moodle platform › blended.uniurb.it

Seminars

The teaching material prepared by the lecturer (such as for instance slides, lecture notes, exercises) and specific communications from the lecturer can be found, together with other supporting activities, inside the blended platform

Teaching

Lectures

Flipped lessons

Innovative teaching methods

Flipped lessons

Attendance

None

Course books

general part: Biavati, Argomenti di diritto processuale civile, BUP, latest edition

special part: Giussani, Efficienza giusta, Giappichelli, 2022, or alternatively Giussani, Corso di diritto processuale delle imprese, BUP, 2015, or alternatively Giussani, Efficienza della giustizia civile e culture della riforma, Wolters Kluwer, 2017

Assessment

Oral exam 

Grades will be assigned out of thirty according to the following scale:

less than 18/30 - insufficient level: the candidate does not achieve any of the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" point;

18-20/30 - sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" point;

21-23/30 - fully sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding" and "applied knowledge and understanding";

24-26/30 - good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding” and “independence of judgement”;

27-29/30 - very good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding”; “independence of judgement” and “communication skills”;

30-30 cum laude - excellent level: the candidate fully achieves the learning outcomes set out in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding”; “independence of judgement”; “communication skills” and “ability to learn”.

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.

Teaching

Materials on blended platform

Attendance

None

Course books

general part: Biavati, Argomenti di diritto processuale civile, BUP, latest edition

special part: Giussani, Efficienza giusta, Giappichelli, 2022, or alternatively Giussani, Corso di diritto processuale delle imprese, BUP, 2015, or alternatively Giussani, Efficienza della giustizia civile e culture della riforma, Wolters Kluwer, 2017

Assessment

Oral exam 

Grades will be assigned out of thirty according to the following scale:

less than 18/30 - insufficient level: the candidate does not achieve any of the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" point;

18-20/30 - sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" point;

21-23/30 - fully sufficient level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the points "knowledge and understanding" and "applied knowledge and understanding";

24-26/30 - good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding” and “independence of judgement”;

27-29/30 - very good level: the candidate achieves, in particular, the learning outcomes foreseen in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding”; “independence of judgement” and “communication skills”;

30-30 cum laude - excellent level: the candidate fully achieves the learning outcomes set out in the "knowledge and understanding" points; “applied knowledge and understanding”; “independence of judgement”; “communication skills” and “ability to learn”.

Disability and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)

Students who have registered their disability certification or SLD certification with the Inclusion and Right to Study Office can request to use conceptual maps (for keywords) during exams.

To this end, it is necessary to send the maps, two weeks before the exam date, to the course instructor, who will verify their compliance with the university guidelines and may request modifications.

The student can request to sit the final exam in English with an alternative bibliography